<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Election-time Inspiration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.babyreagan.net/some-election-time-inspiration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.babyreagan.net/some-election-time-inspiration/</link>
	<description>Conservative Discussion - Punk Rock Ethics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:23:06 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.babyreagan.net/some-election-time-inspiration/comment-page-2/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.babyreagan.net/?p=500#comment-337</guid>
		<description>JGusty,
I am NOT scruffy!
Money management seems to be at the heart here .. I&#039;ll expound later. Right now I have to score some heroin and get to my bookie&#039;s place before he stops taking bets on the Bengals to win out the football season.

Money management I tell you!
CARRY ON.
T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JGusty,<br />
I am NOT scruffy!<br />
Money management seems to be at the heart here .. I&#8217;ll expound later. Right now I have to score some heroin and get to my bookie&#8217;s place before he stops taking bets on the Bengals to win out the football season.</p>
<p>Money management I tell you!<br />
CARRY ON.<br />
T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JGusty</title>
		<link>http://www.babyreagan.net/some-election-time-inspiration/comment-page-2/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>JGusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 05:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.babyreagan.net/?p=500#comment-336</guid>
		<description>Tony &amp; Bill,

I&#039;ve enjoyed reading the back-n-forth. I too am trying to wrap my head around this whole thing. And I too have yet been able to get a clear picture as to the actual impending doom.

My wife &amp; I have great credit and have in fact sold two homes and purchased a third within the last year or so with no issues whatsoever. And interestingly (also recently) I&#039;ve witnessed two separate cases of a live radio show where the hosts (different individuals in different states) were actually soliciting small business owners experiencing credit issues to call in and explain their situations in detail.

And in both cases... there were little if any calls other than people who seemed able to find the money they needed.

And Tony... I have to agree with you. You borrow money. You pay back. Whether you&#039;re a bank or an individual.  If something goes wrong along the way, heads roll in one fashion or another.

It sure SEEMS simple.

But, like you Tony, I too am no expert. Just a scruffy, long-haired rocker dude who pays his bills and tries to make Dave Ramsey proud. 

Seems like there&#039;s an abundance of seemingly intelligent individuals occupying high-level positions in the financial industry who do well by adhering to Dave&#039;s simple, logical and sound advice. Bad money management and dancing too much with the devil-of-credit works against both business and the individual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony &amp; Bill,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve enjoyed reading the back-n-forth. I too am trying to wrap my head around this whole thing. And I too have yet been able to get a clear picture as to the actual impending doom.</p>
<p>My wife &amp; I have great credit and have in fact sold two homes and purchased a third within the last year or so with no issues whatsoever. And interestingly (also recently) I&#8217;ve witnessed two separate cases of a live radio show where the hosts (different individuals in different states) were actually soliciting small business owners experiencing credit issues to call in and explain their situations in detail.</p>
<p>And in both cases&#8230; there were little if any calls other than people who seemed able to find the money they needed.</p>
<p>And Tony&#8230; I have to agree with you. You borrow money. You pay back. Whether you&#8217;re a bank or an individual.  If something goes wrong along the way, heads roll in one fashion or another.</p>
<p>It sure SEEMS simple.</p>
<p>But, like you Tony, I too am no expert. Just a scruffy, long-haired rocker dude who pays his bills and tries to make Dave Ramsey proud. </p>
<p>Seems like there&#8217;s an abundance of seemingly intelligent individuals occupying high-level positions in the financial industry who do well by adhering to Dave&#8217;s simple, logical and sound advice. Bad money management and dancing too much with the devil-of-credit works against both business and the individual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.babyreagan.net/some-election-time-inspiration/comment-page-2/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.babyreagan.net/?p=500#comment-335</guid>
		<description>Bill E,
Can&#039;t help there ... (damn smiley faces) Like I said limited knowledge in this forum...(Finance)
I&#039;m not saying it isn&#039;t real ... I just don&#039;t find a clear grasp of what should be done to remedy it.

CARRY ON.
T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill E,<br />
Can&#8217;t help there &#8230; (damn smiley faces) Like I said limited knowledge in this forum&#8230;(Finance)<br />
I&#8217;m not saying it isn&#8217;t real &#8230; I just don&#8217;t find a clear grasp of what should be done to remedy it.</p>
<p>CARRY ON.<br />
T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill E.</title>
		<link>http://www.babyreagan.net/some-election-time-inspiration/comment-page-2/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.babyreagan.net/?p=500#comment-334</guid>
		<description>Tony
&quot;The line you draw still points to people screwing up all along the way. &quot; Agreed, but now we have to fix their screw-ups. And if you can figure out how to stop them from screwing up in the first place, I&#039;m all ears (insert smiley face here)
 
As for the explanation you seek, and the article I posted, I&#039;m always fascinated when people can read the same article and wind up with opposite reactions. I think the commercial paper problem sounds real, and really serious. To each his/her own I guess....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony<br />
&#8220;The line you draw still points to people screwing up all along the way. &#8221; Agreed, but now we have to fix their screw-ups. And if you can figure out how to stop them from screwing up in the first place, I&#8217;m all ears (insert smiley face here)</p>
<p>As for the explanation you seek, and the article I posted, I&#8217;m always fascinated when people can read the same article and wind up with opposite reactions. I think the commercial paper problem sounds real, and really serious. To each his/her own I guess&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.babyreagan.net/some-election-time-inspiration/comment-page-2/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 17:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.babyreagan.net/?p=500#comment-333</guid>
		<description>Bill E.
Yeah the Greenspan thing is huge. Of course they are more complex, that is what I am looking for, a better explanation.
If an expert says &quot;Things are fundamentally different now.&quot; Fundamentally, Pro Tools records bands but I could explain it much better to a novice. I am not seeing an explanation in any of the articles that I read. I guess I&#039;ll keep searching with everyone here helping...thanks guys...and Jane.

You posted:
&quot;This is a systemic problem that reaches from the ratings agencies to the banks, to aggressive mortgage brokers, to consumers (whether gullible, greedy or otherwise) and back to the banks again.&quot;

The line you draw still points to people screwing up all along the way. 

CARRY ON.
T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill E.<br />
Yeah the Greenspan thing is huge. Of course they are more complex, that is what I am looking for, a better explanation.<br />
If an expert says &#8220;Things are fundamentally different now.&#8221; Fundamentally, Pro Tools records bands but I could explain it much better to a novice. I am not seeing an explanation in any of the articles that I read. I guess I&#8217;ll keep searching with everyone here helping&#8230;thanks guys&#8230;and Jane.</p>
<p>You posted:<br />
&#8220;This is a systemic problem that reaches from the ratings agencies to the banks, to aggressive mortgage brokers, to consumers (whether gullible, greedy or otherwise) and back to the banks again.&#8221;</p>
<p>The line you draw still points to people screwing up all along the way. </p>
<p>CARRY ON.<br />
T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill E.</title>
		<link>http://www.babyreagan.net/some-election-time-inspiration/comment-page-2/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 17:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.babyreagan.net/?p=500#comment-332</guid>
		<description>Tony,
While I&#039;ll grant you that the level of panic by some is certainly higher than it was a year ago, and some of this is definitely attributable to the media picking up this story and running with it, I don&#039;t think that alone explains away the seriousness of this situation. And unfortunately, neither will simply firing bank employees that haven&#039;t performed well. This is a systemic problem that reaches from the ratings agencies to the banks, to aggressive mortgage brokers, to consumers (whether gullible, greedy or otherwise) and back to the banks again. My father too was a v.p. at a large bank, and my family is close friends with a former regional Fed. Chairman,  and I think both of them would have told you that things are much more complex and fundamentally different now than they were even a few years ago. This doesn&#039;t mean that the entire economy is on the verge of collapse, and any media that suggests that is acting irresponsibly, instead I think it means that we are entering a period of transition where things settle out. What will happen next, and what the economic system will look like in the future, remains to be seen. But to me, the very fact that Alan Greenspan admitted that the current situation has caused him to recognize a fundamental flaw in his entire economic belief system is a big deal. I&#039;m not saying that he is perfect, but that&#039;s a pretty big admission from someone who ran the show for decades....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony,<br />
While I&#8217;ll grant you that the level of panic by some is certainly higher than it was a year ago, and some of this is definitely attributable to the media picking up this story and running with it, I don&#8217;t think that alone explains away the seriousness of this situation. And unfortunately, neither will simply firing bank employees that haven&#8217;t performed well. This is a systemic problem that reaches from the ratings agencies to the banks, to aggressive mortgage brokers, to consumers (whether gullible, greedy or otherwise) and back to the banks again. My father too was a v.p. at a large bank, and my family is close friends with a former regional Fed. Chairman,  and I think both of them would have told you that things are much more complex and fundamentally different now than they were even a few years ago. This doesn&#8217;t mean that the entire economy is on the verge of collapse, and any media that suggests that is acting irresponsibly, instead I think it means that we are entering a period of transition where things settle out. What will happen next, and what the economic system will look like in the future, remains to be seen. But to me, the very fact that Alan Greenspan admitted that the current situation has caused him to recognize a fundamental flaw in his entire economic belief system is a big deal. I&#8217;m not saying that he is perfect, but that&#8217;s a pretty big admission from someone who ran the show for decades&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.babyreagan.net/some-election-time-inspiration/comment-page-2/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.babyreagan.net/?p=500#comment-331</guid>
		<description>Bill E,
As I see it your credit should be perfectly in tact. You borrow, you pay back. It is that simple to me. I was not born wealthy or even moderately financially secure, but I have paid my bills and debts. I understand that circumstance happens, injury, lay-off etc... but I have no sympathy for over extenders and ratings agency employees that obviously suck at their jobs ... the list goes on. 

When banks can&#039;t borrow they can&#039;t pay salaries? You&#039;ve got to be kidding. Fire the people that do not perform well. My father -in- law was vice-pres. for a region of a banks, he was in Human Resources, a nice man that was upset each time he let someone go, but if they didn&#039;t do their job.....
I won&#039;t mention the banks but they are doing fine....

Banks lending to banks, lending to baks ....hmmmm interesting.

Thanks for the info Bill E.
I find it amusing that the article points out last year was worse than now.... and yet no panic, &#039;politics/media&#039; anyone?
CARRY ON.
T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill E,<br />
As I see it your credit should be perfectly in tact. You borrow, you pay back. It is that simple to me. I was not born wealthy or even moderately financially secure, but I have paid my bills and debts. I understand that circumstance happens, injury, lay-off etc&#8230; but I have no sympathy for over extenders and ratings agency employees that obviously suck at their jobs &#8230; the list goes on. </p>
<p>When banks can&#8217;t borrow they can&#8217;t pay salaries? You&#8217;ve got to be kidding. Fire the people that do not perform well. My father -in- law was vice-pres. for a region of a banks, he was in Human Resources, a nice man that was upset each time he let someone go, but if they didn&#8217;t do their job&#8230;..<br />
I won&#8217;t mention the banks but they are doing fine&#8230;.</p>
<p>Banks lending to banks, lending to baks &#8230;.hmmmm interesting.</p>
<p>Thanks for the info Bill E.<br />
I find it amusing that the article points out last year was worse than now&#8230;. and yet no panic, &#8216;politics/media&#8217; anyone?<br />
CARRY ON.<br />
T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill E.</title>
		<link>http://www.babyreagan.net/some-election-time-inspiration/comment-page-2/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.babyreagan.net/?p=500#comment-330</guid>
		<description>Gusty and Tony,
While I&#039;m not an economics expert either. The problem I was talking about is connected to the commercial paper sold between banks. Here&#039;s a real quick description of the function of commercial paper:

http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/sep2008/db20080928_417591.htm

So, part of the problem as I understand it is as banks slowly realized (or in some cases admitted) the debt they had accrued due to their investments in questionable mortgage holdings that were rated highly (meaning they were considered safe investments) by the rating agencies in charge of those things when they should have been rated as risky investments, other banks stopped lending because they didn&#039;t have faith that the bank borrowing wasn&#039;t similarly exposed to these bad investments so they didn&#039;t know if the bank could pay back the loan. When banks can&#039;t borrow, they can&#039;t pay their salaries and operating expenses. That then hits consumers as banks can no longer take risks on lending to anyone with anything lower than a perfect credit rating. I think that&#039;s part of the story behind Wachovia. It&#039;s not that Wachovia actually failed, instead their board decided to hedge their bets by selling the company before it failed because they realized that their exposure to these toxic debts was really high. A week later or so later, in fact, Wachovia announced a $23.9 billion loss for the third quarter. So, as I said, I&#039;m no expert on these things, but this is the credit squeeze that I was talking about, and it has hit on a global scale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gusty and Tony,<br />
While I&#8217;m not an economics expert either. The problem I was talking about is connected to the commercial paper sold between banks. Here&#8217;s a real quick description of the function of commercial paper:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/sep2008/db20080928_417591.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/sep2008/db20080928_417591.htm</a></p>
<p>So, part of the problem as I understand it is as banks slowly realized (or in some cases admitted) the debt they had accrued due to their investments in questionable mortgage holdings that were rated highly (meaning they were considered safe investments) by the rating agencies in charge of those things when they should have been rated as risky investments, other banks stopped lending because they didn&#8217;t have faith that the bank borrowing wasn&#8217;t similarly exposed to these bad investments so they didn&#8217;t know if the bank could pay back the loan. When banks can&#8217;t borrow, they can&#8217;t pay their salaries and operating expenses. That then hits consumers as banks can no longer take risks on lending to anyone with anything lower than a perfect credit rating. I think that&#8217;s part of the story behind Wachovia. It&#8217;s not that Wachovia actually failed, instead their board decided to hedge their bets by selling the company before it failed because they realized that their exposure to these toxic debts was really high. A week later or so later, in fact, Wachovia announced a $23.9 billion loss for the third quarter. So, as I said, I&#8217;m no expert on these things, but this is the credit squeeze that I was talking about, and it has hit on a global scale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.babyreagan.net/some-election-time-inspiration/comment-page-2/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 02:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.babyreagan.net/?p=500#comment-327</guid>
		<description>Bill E and JGUSTY,

 I have little knowledge in this field so enlighten me, please.
Is there a problem with banks lending or is the problem consumers thinking they have to keep up w/the Joneses , SUV suburbanites , etc,,, and now they are in a hole... banks tightening who they lend to seems smart and fair to me. I understand that some in power positions allowed greed to corrupt their choices ... but it seems so simple to me... fire the loser, and loan to those that have good credit or a viable business plan. If you take a chance on a business loan and lose ...well... YOU LOSE. This goes for the bank ... to the borrower.. my lawn needs mowed and I have allergies. 
My credit is great so I am betting I&#039;ll get any loan that I need. 

I know this post seems cut and dried but because of my lack of knowledge in this field that is how I see it.
Willing to learn on this subject. 

CARRY ON.
T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill E and JGUSTY,</p>
<p> I have little knowledge in this field so enlighten me, please.<br />
Is there a problem with banks lending or is the problem consumers thinking they have to keep up w/the Joneses , SUV suburbanites , etc,,, and now they are in a hole&#8230; banks tightening who they lend to seems smart and fair to me. I understand that some in power positions allowed greed to corrupt their choices &#8230; but it seems so simple to me&#8230; fire the loser, and loan to those that have good credit or a viable business plan. If you take a chance on a business loan and lose &#8230;well&#8230; YOU LOSE. This goes for the bank &#8230; to the borrower.. my lawn needs mowed and I have allergies.<br />
My credit is great so I am betting I&#8217;ll get any loan that I need. </p>
<p>I know this post seems cut and dried but because of my lack of knowledge in this field that is how I see it.<br />
Willing to learn on this subject. </p>
<p>CARRY ON.<br />
T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JGusty</title>
		<link>http://www.babyreagan.net/some-election-time-inspiration/comment-page-2/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>JGusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 01:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.babyreagan.net/?p=500#comment-325</guid>
		<description>Bill,

Can you elaborate on the lending between banks. I&#039;d like to delve deeper into that part. Specifically the direct relation to the consumer credit industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,</p>
<p>Can you elaborate on the lending between banks. I&#8217;d like to delve deeper into that part. Specifically the direct relation to the consumer credit industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
